Talk:Dr. No (film)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Matthew RD 18:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I shall be conducting this review. At first glance the article seems to be in descent shape, but I'll have a more thorough look at it soon. -- Matthew RD 18:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your patience, now lets get on with the review. I may do bits at a time. This is how the article fairs against the GA criteria:

1. Well written: ✗ Fail, just a few notes below. Address those, and I'll pass it
2. Factually accurate: Sources all seem reliable, mostly from print sources (books) and DVD features, web sources mostly link to newspapers. ✓ Pass
3. Broadness in coverage: ✓ Pass
4. Neutral: ✓ Pass
5. Stability: No issue, just a nice lot of work between Shrodinger's cat and Betty Logan ✓ Pass
6. Images: They both check out fine ✓ Pass

Plot

• Section is under the 700 word limit per WP:FILMPLOT, summarises the film nicely.

Cast

• "ultimately had her voice dubbed over due to heavy accent." Did you mean "ultimately had her voice dubbed over due to a heavy accent"?  Done--Schrodinger's cat is alive (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
• "requered", I think you meant "required"  Done--Schrodinger's cat is alive (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
• "LeWars had make-up to invoke Asian heritage, and eventually was dubbed over." I'm a little confused by that, did that mean her voice was dubbed?  Done--Schrodinger's cat is alive (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Production

• No issues there, everything checks out fine.

Themes

• The second paragraph is unsourced.  Done--Schrodinger's cat is alive (talk) 14:29, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

I'll continue later, so far it seems in order for GA pass. -- Matthew RD 11:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Here's more,

Reception

• "Upon release, Dr. No receiving a mixed critical reception", I think you meant it received mixed critical reception.  Done--Schrodinger's cat is alive (talk) 13:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

And that is that. Just these to sort out, and I will pass the article and thereby bringing back its former GA glory. Good luck. -- Matthew RD 13:29, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

That was quick, well done. I will now pass it. The article is good again. -- Matthew RD 15:41, 14 July 2011 (UTC)