Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Dual education system

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 September 2018 and 15 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jsihite.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ucsdkwoods.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update required

[edit]

To me (German journalist) the section »Problems with dual education« is complete nonsense. »Companies are becoming less willing to take on apprentices«? That might have been the case ten years ago. Presently the situation in Germany is quite different, there are many fields of occupation where companies are desperately seeking apprentices... I'd suggest to delete this part of the article. 62.245.135.254 (talk) 12:37, 16 September 2014 (UTC) (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Markus)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

quote: "3. Mechatronics engineer for the automobile industry (Kraftfahrzeugmechatroniker/in mit Vorgängerberufen) — 23,218"

Mechatronics engineer is a very bad translation of Kraftfahrzeugmechatroniker! An engineer is a person with an academic degree in engineering. Therefor i changed it to mechatronics technologist. 86.56.0.159 03:34, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to make a comment on the talk page every time you make an edit. If you find a bad translation, just change it. Comments such as "this is very bad!" are unnecessary and will only annoy people. I'm sure that isn't what you intended. Saint|swithin 10:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Most if not all of the linked sources don't work properly and only link to dead ends... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.50.63.220 (talk) 08:35, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dual education system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dual education system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 23:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The problems go deeper than that. The article was started in January 2006 as an aspect of the German/Swiss education system translated mainly from the fr, de articles. The de one was flawed as it is was POV on the then current failings. From an education standpoint, this was merely de moving to the system used in the rest of Europe. In 1978 I taught basic arithmetic to hairdressing students doing day-release at an FE college. They came into college two days a week- sent by their employers. de previously had a strng trade guild system where noone could work until they had got their ticket from the controlling organisation- translated as a union. See Modern Apprenticeships for the same system.
Broadly Wikipedians are academics who didn't leave school to enter a trade, and approach vocational education as anthropologists who have just discovered a new tribe. The article would have been written better if some comparative research had been done- this new tribe represents a huge percentage of the planet. But what is a Oven builder (see article lead)?
Moving onto the references- I looked at Handelsblatt (en) and some federal de official docs. They are appalling, written in Google-translate-Englisch. These are press-release spam, they do not pass our RS criteria. Before we try to add new sources we should cull the existing ones.
A little linguistic analysis shows that the title is wrong- Duales Ausbildung de translates directly into Duales vocational education the en have no single word for Ausbilding or indeed Lehrling.
Thanks to everyone who has tried to improve it- maybe delete is the best solution. ClemRutter (talk) 10:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]