Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:EMS Synthi 100

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Intended for

[edit]

According to a BBC documentary on the Radiophonic Workshop the Synthi 100 or 'Delaware' was designed specifically for their use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 16:13, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on EMS Synthi 100. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BBC dates 1970/1971

[edit]

From the different sources, it would appear that 1970 was the correct date for the BBC who specified various modifications for their model. We can only reflect what the sources say and I will adjust accordingly.CV9933 (talk) 11:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that the expression in the lede has been changed from "designed in 1971" to "documented in detail in 1971", which could be a critical difference. In any case, you are absolutely right about reflecting the sources, and I look forward to further results of the ongoing investigation.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 23:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EMS Synthi 100. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

jack dangers' claim

[edit]

I'm sure he's very proud & excited to own a synthi 100, but it quite clearly isn't the only known working example- that's a ridiculous assertion. why's it still in the article?

198.147.19.1 (talk) 20:33, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He actually said in an interview with Martyn Ware [1] that he knew Daniel Miller and Richard D. James also had (I assume working) units too, perhaps that could be added to the article Nuxx1876 (talk) 20:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]