Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Eighth Air Force

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cyber Command Section

[edit]

The Cyber Command section in the article is just the text of an Air Force News Service press release. Needs to be re-written. Bmccaff (talk) 04:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I have add the following links again:

They are not "Linkspam"! The sites are respectable information of scientific institutions.

458th Bombardment Group

[edit]

The 458th were definitely part of the 2d Air Division and we definitely based at RAF Horsham St. Faith, just wondering why they have been removed (along with others) from the 2d Bomb/Air Division section? Rob 12:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 458th is listed in the 2nd table of organization (1945). The group dind't arrive at Norwich until 1944 and aren't shown in the 1943 table, which is listed first. - bwmoll3

Thanks bwmoll3 a case of me being blind to the change. I like the work that you have done on the page. Rob 16:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ) we try. - bwmoll3

File:Airfield burning.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Airfield burning.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 18 October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:43, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eighth Air Force equipment, circa 1956.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Eighth Air Force equipment, circa 1956.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


RAF High Wycombe v RAF Daws Hill

[edit]

People keep confusing RAF High Wycombe and RAF Daws Hill. The 8th was based at the latter, which is in High Wycombe, and not the former, which was British Bomber Command. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.196.43.45 (talk) 08:18, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose rename to: Eighth Air Force (Air Forces Strategic - Global Strike)

[edit]

to reflect actual full nameGaruda28 (talk) 01:51, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as unnecessary (pointless even). Article title is to the point and covers all the history of the Eighth. GraemeLeggett (talk) 07:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eighth Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1943 -- The Year That Vanished

[edit]

Why no mention of any of Eight Air Force's actions in 1943, which include the two raids on Schweinfurt, including the dual Schweinfurt-Regensburg mission, as well as the raid on Ploesti?MrStiv (talk) 18:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention the Stuttgart disaster on 6 Sep 43.... 104.153.40.58 (talk) 23:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this is a total removal of nearly 18 months of VII bomber command. This was a huge part of the bombing campaign in western Europe in WW2, and it is totally absent from this article. there is no separate article on VII command, no other page that describes the actions of the USAAF bombing campaign from mid 1942 to early 1444. nothing, nada, zilch. it is a glaring omission that i dont have the knowledge to fix. This period included some very famous raids, including the Schweinfurt raid etc. In fact the most difficult and costly time of the US bombing campaign is glossed over. This needs to be rectified, either with a separate page on VII command, or an extended history on here.

To my mind it would sensible to write the WWII history of Eighth Air Force, and related commands as separate articles and then use summaries of those articles within this one. They would interlink with and draw upon and reinforce the articles on strategic bombing in World War II, Combined Bomber Offensive and specific operations. GraemeLeggett (talk) 06:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commanders

[edit]

Why does the list start with 2006? Surely there were commanders before then.... 104.153.40.58 (talk) 23:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This just means that we can't find sufficient sources for commanders before the first on that list, which we need to complete such a list at all. Feel free to add the incomplete list tag if you feel it needs work. SuperWIKI (talk) 00:59, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unclear wording

[edit]

I can make no sense of this wording:

Eighth Air Force did not strike at oil industry targets until 13 May 1944 when 749 bombers, escorted by almost 740 fighters, pounded oil targets in the Leipzig area and at Brux in Czechoslovakia. At the same time, a smaller force hit an Fw 190 repair depot at Zwickau. Over 300 German fighters attacked the bomber forces, losing almost half its aircraft, with claims of upwards of 47 Luftwaffe fighters by American fighter pilots. However, the Luftwaffe was successful in shooting down 46 bombers in a very unequal fight.[

Who lost almost half their aircraft? Based on the numbers and losses mentioned, it does not seem as if anybody lost nearly half their aircraft.

And what about this sentence: The other American-flown Boston had been shot down over De Kooy the text mentions that six Bostons were American flown, so shouldn't it be "one of the other" or perhaps it means "all of the other"??

Tupelo the typo fixer (talk) 00:08, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Germans sent 300 fighters, lost half (~150), with American fighter pilots scoring up to 47 of those kills. The rest, we assume, were shot down from other than US fighters, such as allies (if any) or from gunners on the bombers themselves, or other reasons (mechanical failure, friendly fire, etc). 46 US bombers went down. Seems pretty straight forward, although greater detail would be better. You could add the word "downed" between "Lufwaffe fighters" and "by American fighter pilots." and that would be a bit clearer. Dennis Brown - 17:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of men

[edit]

James Mcgauley 2603:9001:5800:E21C:9CB2:6567:7DE7:86AC (talk) 18:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Curtis Lemay

[edit]

Seems like Curtis LeMay, who played a significant role in the development of the Box Formation while a part of the Eighth as well as led groups on the Regensburg and Schweinfurt missions in 1943 qualifies as a "Notable Commander" or other mention somewhere in the overall entry. 2605:A601:AA61:4300:3510:BB78:245F:DC3D (talk) 03:05, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Group

[edit]

The article uses the term group often but doesn't explain what it is and I didn't see a wikilink to an explanation. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 18:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]