Talk:Eric Garris

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Politics: Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

Anti-war Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Foremost pioneer

It would not be an exaggeration to count Eric Garris among the foremost pioneers to tap into the power of the internet, and he may well go down in history as the first to truly harvest its revolutionary political potential. Early on he led the way in tapping into the power of the internet that was absolutely vital for the present old right revival, first with helping found the online magazine LewRockwell.com.

While I have no reason to doubt that Garris helped with LRC, the rest of this statement makes bold assertions that we'd need to attribute to a notable source. -Willmcw 16:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This entry is promotional fluff in most respects. It also refers to lewrockwell.com as a “prominent” web site, but today its ranking among all US web sites is 10,954th. Antiwar.com is ranked 34,343rd (Alexa). Nicmart (talk) 19:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Briggs lawsuit

The article mentions that Garris was one who sued Briggs for absenting himself from a debate. The lawsuit had some sort of resolution or withdrawn. Unless that information is included, the statement should be removed. Nicmart (talk) 19:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-partisan"?

It seems like a major stretch of the word "non-partisan" to use it to describe AntiWar.com here, given the very clear conservative bent of its founders. Being willing to criticize both parties is not "non-partisan," as one can - and these folks apparently do - criticize the Republican party from the right; the section about libertarian dissatisfaction, for instance, does not mention that they considered an entryist strategy towards the Democratic party. 2600:1004:B1A3:85B9:D5B3:90AC:42F:70E9 (talk) 13:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]