Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Esotropia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

note

[edit]

This should probably read that esotropia is incorrectly refered to as "lazy eye." Lazy eye is actually known medically as amblyopia, which is when an eye with reduced vision can't be corrected with corrective lenses. Esotropia is just the form of strabismus where an eye turns in.

www.strabismus.org, amblyopia

Why does "esodeviation" redirect here?

[edit]

Not mentioned in article. 86.130.41.222 (talk) 13:37, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Esotropia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong picture

[edit]

David Prowse had exotropia, not esotropia. 176.228.51.29 (talk) 12:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. I have reverted the edit that changed the picture. Thanks for pointing it out. --Chris Howard (talk) 17:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]