Talk:Evolution Tower

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Technology & engineering / Visual arts / Economy Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the economy of Russia task force.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Evolution Tower2015.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question?

Is the building earth quake proof? 208.102.114.178 (talk) 03:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this issue is already 2 years old, but... Obviously, 90% of such buildings are resistant to earthquakes. Specifically, this (and Moscow City in general) can withstand a 7-point earthquake. By the way, the strongest po in Russia in 1970 reached only 6 5.142.42.153 (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

!UNST

THE FIRST THING THAT IS AMAZING FOR REST ROOM! YOU KNOW HOW YOU ARE YOU HAVE👍 YOU HAVE THE RIGHT THINGS THAT YOU ARE AWESOME ABOUT AND HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT IT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.44.96.180 (talk) 14:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This comment looks like broken English; I wonder what it means? Appletonclack (talk) 14:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Active voice for passive error?

Is this a translation from another language? Article says, "In 2016, Snegiri claimed that Snapbox had unjustly enriched for US$127 million, ...." Does this require the insertion of "been" with this result: "In 2016, Snegiri claimed that Snapbox had been unjustly enriched for US$127 million,..."? (Appletonclack (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC))[reply]

It appears that the uncertain "would be" should be changed to a definite statement

Article says, "Space of the Evolution Tower would be utilized primarily for office purposes but there would also be shopping galleries, boutiques, restaurants, cafes, a supermarket and banquet halls." This statement is footnoted to 2018. Are not the purposes of the tower established by now? Should "would be" be changed to "have been"?(Appletonclack (talk) 14:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC))[reply]