Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Fibonacci word

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About cutting sequences: what do the x and y axis represent? string length? number of zeros? stars in the galaxy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.224.177.128 (talk) 07:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yuk!

[edit]

Would whoever came up with the term 'paradigmatic example' like to say what it means? 31.52.255.29 (talk) 00:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The first and most important example anyone working in this area thinks of when they think of examples? —David Eppstein (talk) 00:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fibonacci word. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

rabbit constant

[edit]

Hi, Is it the same as Rabbit Sequence  ? --Adam majewski (talk) 15:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but with 0 and 1 swapped, see http://oeis.org/A005614, which lists the Rabbit Sequence as the binary complement of the Fibonacci word. 212.65.1.131 (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]