Talk:First Harrogate Trains

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal First Harrogate Trains is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source information

Hull Trains' application to the ORR to run these services can be found at http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.7962 which should provide useful source material for this article. --RFBailey (talk) 20:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Why is this article illustrated with a picture of Cheltenham station? — iridescent 21:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is just to show the 180s. Year1989 (talk) 22:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seem unreasonable to me: after all, it's the intended rolling stock in First's corporate livery. --RFBailey (talk) 05:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I wasn't thinking of it as a particular problem - just curious — iridescent 15:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh - sorry, just saw a 180 on their website so assumed that it would be operated by 180s. So I got a picture.

We shall change it if/when a new livery is applied or when they get started. Btline (talk) 16:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated

Given that this proposal seems to have died (along with their website...), this article needs updating at the very least, and possibly no longer needs to exist? --RFBailey (talk) 15:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest keeping the article in its current state, now that it has been modified to being past tense. Platinum Trains also needs the same treatment - its web site has died a death too. -- NRTurner (talk) 19:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]