Talk:Found (novel)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Okay, I recently read the very website that this summary came from! It's not very wikipedia-sounding, sounds almost like an ad or what would be written on the back of a book. This article can do better. Problem is, I'm busy on some other projects, so is anyone out there up for the clean-up? YelloCello (talk) 22:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. Nearly all of the content was quotations from elsewhere. I removed all that and stubbed it down. --TS 23:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'd still argue that it sounds more like a summary instead of a plot description. Wikipedia plot descriptions typically describe what happens in the novel, complete with the ending, whereas summaries only describe it to a point and leave the reader wondering what's going to happen. I've never actually read the book, but I might get it and read it just so I can write down a more accurate plot description. -- Javawizard (talk) 17:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
CAN SOMEBODY PLEASE ADD A PICTURE OF THIS BOOK WITH ALL THE CAPTION INFORMATION? THANKS! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.133.218.132 (talk) 00:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
changed
[edit]- i have now did what you asked for, 74.133.218.132. I tried to do my best. thanks!. Rident (talk) 14:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Rident
random comment
[edit]Dear Haddix,
your book suks. it is rubbish. I do not understand it atall. why use babies? were youhigh in the making of this book? BLOOOOBADY?
- Redirect-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- NA-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Low-importance children and young adult literature articles
- NA-Class Women writers articles
- NA-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles