Talk:GÖKTUĞ

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / European / Middle East Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Article is written like an advert

In my humble opinion, this article is written more like an advertisement than an actual subjective, neutral and informative one. Please review it. --Ddkatsios (talk) 13:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ddkatsios. If you think it's advert like then be more specific. I looked and I can't really see how it's an advert. Making a comment here with no replies indicates that others didn't see the comment or they did but don't agree. There have been several editors to the article and none of them seemed to think it an advert. Did you discuss this with Arado first? Why didn't you use {{advert}} on the article? You could have sent it to deletion if it was really a major problem. However, moving it to draft isn't going to fix anything. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

R

Merge GÖKTUĞ/Peregrine/Merlin Pages

These three articles (GÖKTUĞ/Peregrine/Merlin) are all stubs while being closely related to each other; the majority of the content in the latter two is contained in the infoboxes, while the first (this article) has entire sections that simply link to the latter two, with another section dedicated to a missile from the program that does not have its own article. Until there is more public information/operational history for the individual missiles produced by this program, I believe it would be better to merge them under this article's banner and flesh out this article with the available information. Maabonnet (talk) 23:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]