Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Gavin Grant (editor)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability

[edit]

He meets WP:CREATIVE #3 based on his involvement in the Year's Best Fantasy and Horror anthologies. These are well-known and regularly reviewed in genre publications (such as Locus). Referencing is a separate issue from notability. I question whether there are sufficient references to ever have much more than a stub, but that is covered by the existing unsourced tag. -- JLaTondre (talk) 15:59, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If its meets WP:NOTAB, then add the supporting references. Other wise removing it is just your opinion. The tag was specifically applied below WP:REFS so that the issue for WP:NOTAB is a lack of refs. Tag reapplied, if your proposition is correct, then add suitable refs to prove it. There are clear cite tags noting where claims need to be supported. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 16:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I added additional references. I hope that addresses your issue of insisting on the tag even though notability was already shown. -- JLaTondre (talk) 17:25, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gavin Grant (editor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]