Talk:Gender fluidity
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
On 23 January 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Genderfluidity to Gender fluidity. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 23 January 2023[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 19:47, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Genderfluidity → Gender fluidity – According to Wiktionary, gender fluidity is preferred. The article is about the concept but it could also be genderfluid if we talk about the identity primarily. Xdtp (talk) 04:41, 23 January 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). UtherSRG (talk) 17:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
We also can base this on how gender neutrality and sexual fluidity are titled Xdtp (talk) 01:14, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- If it's Wiktionary's preferred wording, and the precedent for those two Wikipedia articles, I think it should absolutely be renamed and moved to 'Gender fluidity'
- JDBauby (talk) 21:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.