Talk:GeoNet (New Zealand)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Earthquakes

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 26 October 2024

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

GeoNet (New Zealand) → GeoNet
GeoNet → GeoNet (email host)

– GeoNet (New Zealand) appears to be the primary topic because 1: the other GeoNet does not exist anymore and 2: the New Zealand one is recognisable to most of the New Zealand population, whereas I doubt that many people would recognise the other GeoNet. ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:35, 26 October 2024 (UTC)— Relisting early so banner stays up for at least seven days per WP:RMCI. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support I'd be inclined to support this, partially based on the fact that earthquakes in New Zealand show up as spikes in view numbers for the German GeoNet article. I shall point out that the German GeoNet is still going, but only by name (it is an email hosting service these days). Schwede 66 19:24, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural comment. This is a malformed request and should be procedurally closed if the format is not converted to a multi-move request. The proposed location of the article currently at GeoNet needs to be made explicit in the move request, and there is currently no notification that a move is under consideration at GeoNet or Talk:GeoNet. Dekimasuよ! 05:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per Dekimasu, on nom's behalf, converted to multi-move request and relisted so notification at GeoNet or Talk:GeoNet goes for seven days. I have no strong attachment to "GeoNet (email host)"—just used Schwede66's comment to propose a destination other than "?". Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Rotideypoc41352. I did see that this was malformed but did not bother doing anything about it because there was a notification on the German GeoNet's talk page. Nonetheless, it’s good that it’s now a proper multi-request. Schwede 66 17:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ~~2nd~~1st, the email host has 71 views but the New Zealand one only has 46[[1]] so a DAB is probably better. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just a question, if you're proposing a DAB then wouldn't that be supporting the second and opposing the first, rather than the other way round? Turnagra (talk) 23:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected. Crouch, Swale (talk) 23:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At this point in time the New Zealand GeoNet page does not appear on Google, so the view count is temporarily deflated. We're comparing apples to oranges here. ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: At least to a disambiguation page. Per Schewede it seems that users are mostly trying to find the article on the New Zealand service. --Spekkios (talk) 20:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that people have tried drawing phalluses on the earthquake monitoring website GeoNet?

Source: https://thespinoff.co.nz/science/11-10-2024/whos-the-aucklander-who-claims-to-feel-every-earthquake-in-new-zealand -- it says "certain appendage"

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Lego Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures

Created by Panamitsu (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 51 past nominations.

―Panamitsu (talk) 03:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Length, date, qpq, close paraphrase check ok. But is there a possibility for a second reference for the hook fact? The notion that 'certain appendage' is to be understood as a dick requires a bit of reading between the lines, but the ref also talks about this as an one-off incident. --Soman (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm okay. I've had a look for another source but couldn't find one. Does this mean that I have to find another fact? I've at least changed the plurality of the hook to address that concern.

ALT1:

... that people have tried drawing a phallus on the earthquake monitoring website GeoNet?

―Panamitsu (talk) 21:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]