Talk:Gizmodo

This article was nominated for deletion on January 24, 2007. The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rooster Teeth

can someone add a link to the podcasts page? i dont know how.

its page is here.http://roosterteeth.com/groups/profile.php?id=6123

Blatantly obvious Apply fanboyism

I think there should be a section regarding the common criticism that Gizmodo has gone from reputable tech site to being an Apple fanboy's wet dream. Just about every article on it for the past few years have been praising Apple endlessly and criticizing everyone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.91.139 (talk)

I'd agree, but unless there are verifiable sources you can't include it in the article. Plus, it'd be pretty difficult to represent it neutrally. --Topperfalkon (talk) 17:45, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First Talk Page Post About Something!

So we've added the #whitenoise section. It looks pretty nice. Feel free to edit anything wonderfully new in, as is your right. If anyone feels like getting rid of it, let us know here, perhaps we can talk. Four tildes now?

Sithishade (talk) 07:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let's throw something in there about Bill. He seems like a cool guy that impacted the community like no one's business. - Totallynotbilliswear —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.172.251.54 (talk) 03:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

Generally when a company has broken laws (as with the iPhone) and caused controversy and disruptions (as with the TVBGone thing), we call that controversy, not coverage. It would be biased to call it anything else. 174.112.18.193 (talk) 01:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gizmodo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Univision unloaded the digital properties from Gawker

https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/08/media/univision-sells-gizmodo/index.html

https://www.thedailybeast.com/deadspin-editor-quits-rails-against-bosses-ive-been-repeatedly-lied-to-and-gaslit

This got very little publicity and affects a lot of articles. I don't feel qualified to edit these articles. StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Cruz?

Would the citation about Ted Cruz, citing it during the facebook hearings count? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.201.184.88 (talk) 03:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]