Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Grant Hill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move request, November 2005

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
  • Oppose Grant Hill is a prominent Canadian politican, and even served for a time as opposition leader. - SimonP 22:46, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The majority of people searching for Grant Hill will be looking for the basketball player. Adding a disambiguation link or a direct link to the other Hill should be good enough. Drunkasian 2005-12-01 20:23 (UTC)
  • support 3 of the first 5 entries when you google grant hill site:en-two.iwiki.icu are about the athlete or has references to him. to be fair, 3 of the next 5 are references are to the politician, but i agree with the previous poster/voter. 68.240.150.70 01:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • support. The disparity is even greater when googling the internet as a whole. Even if you limit the search to only Canadian websites ("Grant Hill" site:.ca) and look at the first ten results, it's a near-even 6-4 split favoring the NBA player. It appears the basketball player and the Canadian politician are about equally notable in Canada, but the Grant Hill of the NBA is eminently more famous everywhere else, as the NBA has fans worldwide, due in part to players being drafted from all over the globe. He currently has a teammate from Turkey and one from Croatia, whose fans back home have undoubtedly never heard of Grant Hill (politician). — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 22:15, Jan. 13, 2006

Moved. —Nightstallion (?) 07:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Someone changed "Grant Hill" back to a dab page, but I moved it back again in accoradnce with the consensus above. Please discuss any changes in the future before taking unilateral action. Grant Hill the basketball player is known worldwide; Grant Hill the politican is not. Operating on the principle of least surprise, we must have the Grant Hill article be about the basketball player. Otherwise, what's next? Making London a dab page because of London, Ontario? StarryEyes 12:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus. sighs Why must all of you be so difficult with simple WP:RM... —Nightstallion (?) 08:15, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Move Vote

[edit]

NEW MOVE VOTE OK, well, someone moved it back, not necessarily because it was illegitimate, but because it was a cut-and-paste move. So I'm going through the official channels. Maybe some benevolent soul will realize this is rather silly since there's already a consensus above and move it back where it belongs. StarryEyes 23:03, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

Talk:Grant Hill (basketball)Grant Hill (basketball)Grant Hill

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Sense of Style

[edit]

Can someone put a source to the data about Grant Hill and his apparent love of turtle necks? I think we should remove that section if nothing is added. April 2nd Grassferry49

Requested move (April)

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Grant Hill (basketball player)Grant Hill (basketball)

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
  • Support; All other basketball players/coaches with ambiguous names have just (basketball) to differentiate them from other similarly named articles (except in rare circumstances such as Mike Brown (the player)/(the coach) and Jerry Reynolds (the player)/(the coach)). The player part, I believe, has the potential to become obsolete, the ramifications of which will affect all articles of basketball-related biographies of ambiguous nomenclature down the track. Cutting it down to just (basketball) only would be the consensus decision that could be agreed upon. FYI: Up until a few weeks ago it was already Grant Hill (basketball), it was moved. --Downwards 04:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Since he is a basketball player and not a basketball, I really don't see why this system is in place. Generally such disambiguation is done by profession (actor, singer, etc.) rather than industry. The current title makes more sense from that perspective. If all of the other basketball articles are set up that way, though, I suppose the talk page of this article is isn't the place to fight for a new standard. Dekimasuよ! 11:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

This article has been renamed from Grant Hill (basketball player) to Grant Hill (basketball) as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 06:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GrantHillPoster.jpg

[edit]

Image:GrantHillPoster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sportsmanship award

[edit]

Does anyone know what went into him winning twice? This is definitely notable enough to elaborate further on.--68.56.17.70 (talk) 17:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grant Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Grant Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Grant Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs more sources

[edit]

Lots of unsourced material in this article. SunCrow (talk) 09:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]