Talk:Guiyu, Guangdong

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities Start‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Guangdong may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in China may be able to help!

Population

What is the population of the town? Badagnani 15:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to Google Translate and my limited knowledge of Chinese characters, the Chinese article gives a total population of 133,000 people. 132.178.174.126 (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Support merge of E-waste village to Guiyu. Badagnani (talk) 05:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional: if the title E-waste village is retained for the generic sense, including Guiyu and possibly others.

-- Wavelength (talk) 05:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer the title E-waste village, because down the tract may be some other villages pop up, then we no need to change again. Arilang ^talk 13:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support No other info has been added to warrant keeping such article. Not a crystal ball and all that. If and when more information does come to light, we can create E-waste village as a full title then. It's also not a very good name, since Guiyu is patently not a village. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 00:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep E-waste village and merge Guiyu into it, since Guiyu is localised to China only, and E-waste village has the potential to be built up into international article, since E-waste disposal problems and resulting harm to the people and the environment also happen in Africa and India. So it is a global problem, not a Chinese only problem. Arilang ^talk 14:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Internet video

If editors care to watch all these video links, then we can all see the long term or permanent problems caused by these E-waste to the whole world, not confined only in China. Arilang ^talk 02:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This is about the actual term "e-waste village," not the existence of e-waste dumps in various places. Badagnani (talk) 03:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Current state of articles

Well, E-waste village seems to have been developed beyond contents only about Guiyu. My preference would now be to let it stand - provided that the former can be wikified and referenced properly!

Aside: what was the point of all those youtube links? --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 00:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To answer the comment:what was the point of all those youtube links?, well, "A picture say a thousand words", a video would say a million words? Arilang ^talk 17:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They look almost like propaganda. Youtube is not a reliable source. What relevance did they have to the merger proposal? Or did you intend them as sources for the article? --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 02:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since I split out Electronic waste in Guiyu the merge proposal is now redundant. It is an important and notable issue and therefore deserves its own article. As it was it gave the Guiyu to much of a bias to the e-waste issue. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guiyu in Popular Media

Guiyu was featured in an episode of "CSI:NY," specifically, the episode "Green Piece." I do not know of any other mentions of this city in popular media, but this should be awfully interesting to us anyway. Sean 0000001 (talk) 07:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guiyu (town). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828105017/http://www.china-pix.com/multimedia/guiyu/ to http://www.china-pix.com/multimedia/guiyu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]