Talk:Halesworth

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia: Suffolk Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suffolk task force.

Untitled

This article reads more like a blurb from a tourism brochure than an encyclopedia article. I would happily change it myself but Im really quite busy. Gingerblokey 21:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a start to the beginning of the article...GrahamHardy (talk) 17:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:UKCITIES for guidance. -- Jza84 · (talk) 13:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am a Halesworth Resident, And I wrote part of this, I am sorry if its deemed incorrect and i will strive to help along the route to putting it correct, I know however the sports part is accurate —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlanJBlue (talk • contribs) 11:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not, or does not any longer, seem to me to have any bias whatever (by present editing guidelines). There could suitably be substantial overlap between enyclopaedia articles and text that one might find in a promotional brochure. Nothing in the present article seems to me particularly unsuitable for the former (or the latter). Moreover, based on my personal residential experience, it seems to be an accurate and helpful article. Perhaps it is time to move to deeming the dispute resolved? H.blumberg (talk) 10:56, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]