Talk:Hardnose shark

Hardnose shark has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 15, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Sharks Low‑importance

	Sharks portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sharks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sharks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SharksWikipedia:WikiProject SharksTemplate:WikiProject Sharksshark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright problem removed

This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you. -- ascidian | talk-to-me 16:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hardnose shark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jimfbleak (talk · contribs) 05:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll start the review later, got to get some gardening done before the rain starts Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First pass Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the map, there are at least six BE English-speaking countries in this shark's range, and none that are AE English-speaking. AE seems an inappropriate variety of English.

I ran the text through an online AE-BE convertor. I'm not that familiar with BE so let me know if I missed something.

You don't need the species' name in the range map, it's assumed to be for the subject of the article

True, I just like the longer caption because I think less white space looks better in the infobox.

modest-sized—not sure this works, "medium-sized" or "modest" ?

Changed to "modestly sized"

perhaps a couple of words qualifying Theodore Gill, as you have done with the Germans

Added

macloti I understand, but why Maclot's shark when he's named Macklot?

I don't know why. Maybe people forgot the etymology and just went by the binomial.

In the description, I'd be inclined to start with the general appearance rather than the, admittedly peculiar, snout.

Rearranged

originates roughly over the pectoral fin free rear tips.—not sure I understand this, why "free"

This is a specific technical term for sharks. I've added a link for it.

less than 50 km (31 mi) —"31" seems over-precise for a "less than"

Adjusted the sig figs for the conversion

Bony fishes form the main part of its diet—"its" separated from its subject by an intervening sentence

Changed to "this shark's diet"

Known parasites—as opposed to unknown?

"Known" removed

Ref 1 needs italicised binomial

Fixed

I'll have another read after I see your comments Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 17:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everything above looks OK, I'll probably leave it until tomorrow to have a second read. If I don't find anything significant, I'll do the GA then Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:13, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. -- Yzx (talk) 06:38, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]