Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Heckler & Koch HK33/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Explain

Royal Thai Military and Royal Thai Police used HK33 , HK33A1 , and HK33K. Because HK33 manufactured under a license agreement by Royal Thai Army Ordnance and use in service since 1958. Thai Military and Police never bought HK33A2 to use in service. They used HK G36 series instead of HK33A2.

My English is very bad , I'm sorry.

Do you have any sources? How is the HK33 license-produced since 1958 when it was introduced in the 1960s? What about the G36? Koalorka (talk) 16:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I have source of HK33 rifle in Thai language only. And G36 is H&K G36 assault rifle.
Great, please list them. Koalorka (talk) 20:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Clean-up

I cleaned up the atrocious and nonsensical grammar. Hotspur23 20:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Image

A HK 33A2 photo is add. zh:User:Evers18:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Merge with HK53?

The HK53 really has no unique information apart from the rare MICV and GR variants, which would be included here. That article has no potential to evolve into anything beyond a stub, I'd like to integrate the rest of the information into the variants section here. Koalorka (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Someone just removed the HK53 content from the HK33 and claimed the HK53 is an entirely new firearm. Please refrain from making such uninformed edits, or at least try to substantiate such wild claims. Koalorka (talk) 06:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Off-topic: I'd like to see an image of the HK53 on this page as well (in the Variants section). Anyone? Muad (talk) 09:51, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Recent edits

I have never encountered an HK33F variant in any literature. You claim that it was a prototype? The HK33E modifications were a result of the HK33F? Koalorka (talk) 02:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

March 2019 edit

Preserving here by providing this link; my rationale was: "undue WP:PROMO". Articles on other products do not include lists of users. --K.e.coffman (talk) 20:34, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Articles on arms do, as do reliable sources such as Jane's.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)