Talk:Helepolis

Greece High‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Compare with article Rhodes

The article on Rhodes says:

In 305 BC, Antigonus had his son besiege Rhodes in an attempt to break the alliance. After a year they gave up and signed a peace agreement in 304 BC, leaving behind a huge store of military equipment. The Rhodians sold the equipment and used the money to erect a statue of their sun god, Helios, the statue now known as the Colossus of Rhodes.

According to the above, it would seem that this heleopolis was unsucessful - perhaps a point worth making. Also, it was not the materials, but the funds raised by their sale that permitted the construction of the collossus. Gaius Cornelius 17:25, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That speed can't be right.

.00025km/hr? That's less than 10 inches/hour. dan

160 tons pushed by people - sounds like a project for Mythbusters! Egmason (talk) 10:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That would equal to 1 metre in 4 hours. Though it is not in the article anymore, so this irrelevant... 193.210.193.109 (talk) 15:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Modern units

Is there any reason to describe the Helepolis in something archaic like cubits? I'm putting in my hat for modern units.

Failure of the siege

This article could stand to include information on the failure of the siege of Rhodes. I had heard that the Helepolis was made largely worthless when it got bogged down in the mud, but a sourced mention would be good.

Rewrite

I rewrote the entire page as it read as if there were two helepolis's and also most was a direct copy/paste from a copyright source anyway which I think is what caused the duplication.

I added a source which gives the reason the helepolis didn't work and included the reason in the text.

The iron plates were melted down and used to build the colossus. The sale of the equipment paid for the labour and the bronze that was used as a thin skin over the iron.

The page for siege of Rhodes has the reasons for the failure of the siege so is not needed here. Wayne 01:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pictures?

pictures/figures? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.179.117.76 (talk) 01:19, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Created / Added picture. Egmason (talk) 10:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Helepolis/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I would honestly say that most of this article is very inapropriate, I have personally researched the subject at hand, and the information in this article is not very accurate

Last edited at 18:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 17:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Helepolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091020082612/http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/war/Helepolis.htm to http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/war/Helepolis.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3D model?

description in image page says: "3d model and cross-section of Helepolis approximately as described in wiki article"
however, the 3d model only has 6 floors while the museum model apparently has 9 floors. does that mean the 3d model creator cannot count?
according the text the scructure had at least 7 floors (as described in the weapons placements): first, second, and "next five floors". 193.210.193.109 (talk) 15:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]