Talk:History of rail transport in Great Britain 1995 to date

Trains: in UK / in Scotland Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland (assessed as High-importance).

Proposals

Should proposals be included in this? Simply south 17:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article lacks any mention of the ongoing work to restore the Varsity Line and the link now from Marylebone to Oxford via Bicester courtesy of a new chord at Bicester. A serious omission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.59.159 (talk) 20:51, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

larkhall the largest town in scotland without a railway??

what about kirkintilloch, much bigger town and no railway unless you are counting lenzie station as kirkintilloch, although lenzie is not kirkintilloch —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.43.237.101 (talk) 10:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:History of rail transport in Great Britain to 1830 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of rail transport in Great Britain 1995 to date. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160916103808/https://www.theguardian.com/sainsburys-bank-future-families/2015/jun/19/the-second-golden-age-of-rail-new-fast-trains-will-soon-offer-a-genuine-alternative-to-air-travel to https://www.theguardian.com/sainsburys-bank-future-families/2015/jun/19/the-second-golden-age-of-rail-new-fast-trains-will-soon-offer-a-genuine-alternative-to-air-travel

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of rail transport in Great Britain 1995 to date. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071005185339/http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/330-rev3.pdf to http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/330-rev3.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of rail transport in Great Britain 1995 to date. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Covid 19 effects on Britains Railways

I added this section because clearly it happened in this timeline and has massively affected the railways. GRALISTAIR (talk) 20:31, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also added a short Covid 19 paragraph in the introduction GRALISTAIR (talk) 21:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline needs near-future projects added

History_of_rail_transport_in_Great_Britain_1995_to_date#Timeline_of_improvements has several missing projects from the MetroWest (Bristol) improvements, notably: Portishead Railway reopening to passengers in 2023; new stations along the Henbury line such as Filton North; and Charfield station north of Yate in 2024 as well as longer-term aspirations further afield such as Corsham and Stonehouse Bristol Road that are progressing well. Thanks! 82.108.2.131 (talk) 13:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree an update is needed but I suggest we wait until after the May elections as in theory we are election purdah at the moment. There are sure to be other announcements. GRALISTAIR (talk) 14:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does "election purdah" have to do with it? If a project is under way, with funding provided and spades in the ground, and it's all been reported in a WP:RS, we may report it as fact. What we can't do (regardless of whether elections are upcoming or not) is speculate on what might or should happen. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 05:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of current rolling stock

I feel the list of current rolling stock should be removed from this page, even though clearly a lot of work has gone in to it. First, this page summarises a history of rail transport. A list of current rolling stock is not historical, and as a summary page providing a full list of rolling stock seems inconsistent. Secondly, there are already pages on wikipedia that list current and ex rolling stock, linking to these seems more appropiate and avoids duplication. Foxdown (talk) 14:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea. JFDI! Per WP:BRD - be bold, if others revert it then we come back here to discuss further. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to second its removal. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thirded – of little value here and definitely not enough to offset the maintenance burden. XAM2175 ^(T) 15:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for all your helpful and positive responses and changes, and the link to BRD which I had not seen. As this was my first edit on this page, I didn't want to run straight in and remove a large portion of it which had obviously taken time to put together. Foxdown (talk) 14:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have a good instinct for article improvement. Keep on sniffing out the opportunities. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed! XAM2175 ^(T) 18:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]