Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Hotel Otava

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infobox

[edit]

Ok, well seeing as the IP can't be bothered to log in, I'll start this, even though per WP:BRD the onus is not on me to do so. Joe K was Bold by adding the infobox; I Reverted, now they, or whoever, should Discuss. It's simple really. Oh, and while we, or I, it seems, discusses it, the article remains at the last stable version which was without the box. CassiantoTalk 20:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi? I am ready for discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.254.222.97 (talk) 20:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing really to discuss, other than your disruptive behaviour that you seem to be exhibiting. When you can grow up, we can talk. CassiantoTalk 20:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, talk about what? I would like to keep the box, and I am not sure why you are trying to remove it. I have tried to compromise, per the article you reference. Is that satisfactory as it is now shorter. 150.254.222.97 (talk) 20:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you try and expand the article rather than expand the infobox? We are not catering for idiots. CassiantoTalk 20:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the box is necessary yet. Maybe when the article's longer and more in-depth. For example, Enemies of the People doesn't have an infobox, whereas Hyde Park, London does. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. I'm not opposed to a box eventually, but now is not the right time. Like I say, IP, create an account, write and source some content, and then add the box. CassiantoTalk 20:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, once I have expanded the article, I can then add the box. Thanks. 150.254.222.97 (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have followed your steps and added some content. I have added a half-box as a compromise, although I think the expanded article is now long enough that the full box doesn't look silly either. Tadeusz.1967 (talk) 21:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are socking. The box still looks ridiculous so I've removed it again. Can I ask why it means so much for you to have this infobox in place? CassiantoTalk 07:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]