Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Hydraulic press

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why does this say it is called the Bramah press after Pascal? Does anybody else notice that these two names are not the same? Why is no explanation given? Mike 14:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hydraulic force increase diagram needs to be replaced

[edit]

There are two problems with this diagram. First, the equation is incorrect (or misleading). The diagram appears to say that F1=F2*(A2/A1). In fact, the forces are equal, with F1=F2. Additionally, the figure caption deepens this misconception by stating "Hydraulic force increase". It should read "Hydraulic pressure increase", with the equation reading "p1=p2*(A2/A1)". Danielhogg (talk) 14:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


F1 in the opposite direction F2

[edit]

Forces are directed opposite to each other. If F1 is pushed into the piston cylinder, the pressure on the body F2 of the cylinder! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluegene (talkcontribs) 17:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History

[edit]

This page lacks a history section. Joseph Whitworth was probably the first to make a viable hydraulic forging press, but others were trying to make them at about the same time, eg Nasmyth, in the 1860s. Someone more knowledgeable that I could add such a section. FreeFlow99 (talk) 09:46, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Forging is relatively minor for hydraulics - at least in the Victorian period. Power hammers when were first water-driven trip hammers, then Nasmyth's steam hammer. Pneumatic and hydraulic replacement of these were much later.
Industrial hydraulic presses developed first, not as metal forming, but as packaging presses. Lots of bulky plant-based materials were baled for shipping and this was an important market for press makers. The first two names to look at would be Bramah and Tangye. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hydraulic press. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How much can a hydraulic press press?

[edit]
On behalf of 66.18.171.109

How much do you need? The design is such that it's fairly easy to couple separate press rams together to make a bigger and bigger overall press.

Personally I've made sheetmetal panels for cars with a 1,000 ton press, but that was unusual as the production line presses were mechanical (they're faster). The first big hydraulic cylinders were made by Joseph Bramah and used to launch the SS Great Eastern by pushing it sideways. For forging hot steel, 10,000 ton presses aren't unusual. Shultz Steel in California have a 40,000 ton press [1][2]. An impressive example of such hydraulic forgework would be the new titanium spheres for the submersible DSV Alvin made a few years back by ATI Ladish in Wisconsin.[3][4] - not sure of the force though, but it will be tens of thousands. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Application and Figure shown

[edit]

I'm making edits for a class assignments. I plan on expanding on the Application section and possibly finding a better figure to illustrate the principle. Anmirzaians (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]