Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Icarus Project

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV Issues

[edit]
  • Article reads as though written by supporters of this group. Is uniformly laudatory. Needs to be written to be more neutral.Fagles 22:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

It is agreed that this piece appears to have been written almost solely by supporters of the group; it needs to be extensively rewritten to demonstrate the place of the Icarus Project in mental health society as a whole. Homer27 08:13, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While this article is does not adhere to Wikipedia's POV standards, it is worth mentioning that the problem lies with presentation, not content. I advise, for what it is worth, that any changes in this regard preserve the content given and rephrase it in a more encyclopedic fashion. Loathe as I am to admit it, even an "advertisement" can contain valuable knowledge, provided the information is presented in the proper context. Deimos1313 (talk) 22:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation is indeed poor, and a number of users listed in the history may be members of the Icarus project. I too recommend significant updates (the project has developed tremendously since this page was started) as well as less of an "advertising/recruiting" undertone. The project has been going long enough that I don't think it will be too difficult to accomplish this however. Ileana37 (talk) 09:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article categorization

[edit]

This article seems to have been added to a multitude of categories more to advertise it than for its relevance to those categories. This is not an article relating directly to psychosis, for example, so it should not be categorized in Psychosis and likewise for the categories Anxiety disorders, Mood disorders, and Personality disorders. I have left some of the categories for now because I am not familiar enough with them to know whether this article would belong or not (e.g., Activism).

This article most definitely relates to mood disorders as the Icarus Project was primarily set up for people with Bipolar Disorder. I don't know how to re-add a category, so perhaps someone else could do it. Pigkeeper 20:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone editing this article happens to be a member of the Icarus Project, remember that this is a neutral encyclopedia and not a publicity tool.--NeantHumain 23:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article does indeed relate to psychosis, mood disorders, etc. It is a source of alternative views on these matters, and censoring it in this regard is a gross violation of Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Deimos1313 (talk) 22:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article certainly should remain under the Activism category, since activism on behalf of those diagnosed with several mental conditions is one of the key functions of the Icarus Project. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.172.65 (talk) 14:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with the topic remaining under Activism...in fact it is more at home there than anywhere else. Ileana37 (talk) 08:12, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Change title of this page

[edit]

The title of this page is confusing; this is only one group of several named "Project Icarus". I added some disambiguation at the beginning of this article, but I'd like to suggest that this page should be renamed The Icarus Project (mental health), and that the page "Icarus Project" should be a redirect page pointing to that page, Project Icarus (Interstellar Probe Design Study), and Project Icarus. Geoffrey.landis (talk) 13:10, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Icarus Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Icarus Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Icarus Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]