Talk:Instant film

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2020 and 30 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Edwardpang96.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Impossible Mission

Exciting news, A group called The Impossible Mission have bought the Polaroid factory and equipment and aim to start mass production in early 2010. Does anyone else have any information to add to this page on the matter? The website is [|http://www.the-impossible-project.com/] George5210 (talk) 21:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*

FTA: "Some modern film packs also contain a flat electrical battery to drive motors in the camera.", I presume it means physically flat, not dis-charged, is this correct? If so I shall re-word it less confusingly. Boffy b 10:14, 2004 Dec 19 (UTC)

Perhaps we can just replace the word "flat" with "thin"? Brianjd 10:16, 2004 Dec 19 (UTC)

I removed the following statement:

As an interesting side note, Mr. Land approached Kodak with his film and camera idea and was turned down before approaching the Polaroid company. The issue was his insistence on using his name on his camera, hence the name "Polaroid Land Camera." Kodak was unwilling to deal, to their later regret.

Since Mr. Land founded the Polaroid Corporation, I find it hard to believe he went to Kodak before approaching the Polaroid Company. -- Egil 19:07, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

How did Polaroid manage to hang on to the patent for 50+ years?

I'm amazed that I've never been able to find any info about this. Polaroid sued Kodak for infringing on a 30 year old patent. And won. Patents only last 17 years, right? Does anyone know anything about this? -- Richfife 19:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The usual way is to keep patenting new things, new improvements. As well as I know it, the integral (no peeling needed) film was the important one. Polaroid started designing it after learning about how many of the peel off tabs and negatives were littering popular tourist locations.

The Polaroid integral film is exposed from the front (viewing side), which means it needs a mirror to reverse the image. The Kodak (and very similar Fuji) version is exposed from the back. Kodak thought that would be a big enough improvement to satisfy patent courts that it was not infringing. In any case, it was less than 17 years from SX-70 and its film. Gah4 (talk) 05:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17 years unless stared otherwise i thought —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.209.83.146 (talk) 11:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joe McNally and Life-Size Polaroids

While the article mentions 8" x 10" being the maximum size of Polaroid film, and this is probably true in a retail sense, there were 40" x 80" prints made by LIFE photographer Joe McNally, exhibited as Faces of Ground Zero. The exhibit was sponsored by Morgan Stanley and an external article about the exhibit can be found here: [1]. Dj69 02:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POLAROID FILM WORKS FROM MAGIC —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.244.35 (talk) 06:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Instant film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080415191029/http://www.nedcc.org:80/resources/leaflets/5Photographs/03CareOfPhotos.php to http://www.nedcc.org/resources/leaflets/5Photographs/03CareOfPhotos.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Instant film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Instant film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The first image is a bit odd

This might just be me, but I feel like the thumbnail with the picture examples looks weird. Are they cut-outs of someone? What are the images even of? WinterWarp (talk) 15:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like they are actually photos of cardboard cutouts shaped like a person. TooManyFingers (talk) 04:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lowest speed in instant film

the article right now says instant film was made in speeds as slow as iso 4, but i believe this to be a typo because the lowest iso i could find for instant film was iso 40 here: https://books.google.com/books?id=Nx8_7xbot7cC&pg=PA60&dq=iso+40+instant+film&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi3psj45ayGAxXhRTABHdJfDzgQ6AF6BAgHEAI#v=onepage&q=iso%2040%20instant%20film&f=false should the article lead be changed to say the lowest speed in instant films is iso 40? Pancho507 (talk) 02:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Packfilm"

The average person has no idea what "packfilm" means. If you want to use the word in an article, please first clearly explain what it is. TooManyFingers (talk) 20:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]