Talk:Interspel

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Writing systems Low‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tone[edit]

This article seems to be written in a way that does not describe the subject, but rather explains it from the subject's own point of view. Hence it is not encyclopaedic.

Yes, it is very pro-Interspel. Are there not any criticisms of this approach which we could find? (I, for example, find the use of accent marks to be a clear disadvantage (too hard to type, nobody will be bothered, too non-English looking)). JIMp_talk·cont 08:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

vizion??[edit]

What the hell is this vizion thing? As far as I can determine, it is not an alternate spelling of vision. Wschart (talk) 00:01, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]