Talk:Ipomoea

Ipomoea Project

I've took the liberty on making an Ipomoea wikiproject.It's still in a proposal stage but if we have enough people joining the project and editting the page,we'll be able to make it into a complete project. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals/Project_Ipomoea

Psychoactivity

I don't know how to make a comment on a page, so please forgive me if I am quite out of order here. I wanted to query the remark: "...this is not supported by scientific studies which show that although pyschoactive these compounds are not notably psychoactive or hallucinogenic." Does it mean that they are somewhat, but not very psychoactive? Otherwise it looks like a bit of a contradiction. I am not an expert, I just happened to be looking up the decorative varieties of this flower when this item caught my eye. Again, I apologise if this is the wrong way to go about things. David Wright —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawright12 (talk • contribs) 16:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey David. I Suggest putting a 'Citation Needed' tag on that sentence you found. Unless you can reword it better. Nessie (talk) 23:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion. I will try to do that. I appreciate the courteous advice.Dawright12 (talk) 20:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Different species

Please look at the following links regarding clarifying the misapprehensions between the 2 completely different species of Ipomoea tricolor and Ipomoea violacea

Ipomoea tricolor Cav = Ipomoea violacea auct. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?20231

Ipomoea violacea auct. = misapplied by authors http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?406360

Ipomoea violacea L. - I recently induced the USDA to remove any reference to 'heavenly blue' from the legitimate Ipomoea violacea entry http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?20238

The references in literature to the psychoactivity of Ipomoea violacea are almost always in reference to Ipomoea violacea as auct. and as such are not really in reference to Ipomoea violacea (L) as a distinct legitimate species from Ipomoea tricolor.

scroll down the main entry page to see Ron_Convolvulaceae's (my) comments http://davesgarden.com/guides/pf/go/57559/

The 2 different species are not closely related enough to form inter-specific hybrids and nowhere are any true-inter-specific hybrids between I.tricolor and I.violacea documented. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.251.196 (talk) 05:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name error?

It seems that there is an error with the caption of "Ipomoea oenthenarae" and the corresponding wikimedia http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ipomoea_oenthenarae_habit.jpg. The correct name should be "Ipomoea oenotherae". This is the name used in the "list of species".

On the German page http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipomoea_oenotherae, the very same picture is found with the name "Ipomoea oenotherae". This name exsists both in IPNI and Tropicos databases. Conversely, "Ipomoea oenthenarae" is found only within wikipedia and wikpmedia pages…

I am no more than a vistor, and I am not a specialist of Ipomoea. Could somebody solve this problem?

DSW — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsw2 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The caption has been amended and the image is now at File:Ipomoea oenotherae habit.jpg.--Melburnian (talk) 11:47, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ipomoea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100528154450/http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?6064 to http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?6064

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moonflower

Iwant information about the moonflower 106.66.28.219 (talk) 14:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]