Talk:Irvine Transportation Center

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

This article lacks references.

Requested move 1 August 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 15:13, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Irvine (train station) → Irvine Transportation Center – Article was moved to the latter title (by me) in ~~August~~ November 2014 as the WP:COMMONNAME; article was then inexplicably moved back to the current title by Torritorri a week ago. Problem with the current title is that it is completely wrong under the guideline WP:USSTATION. I'll argue that Irvine Transportation Center is a better title as both the WP:COMMONNAME (e.g. see this from Amtrak and this from OCTA which both explicitly use "Irvine Transportation Center"), and under WP:NATURALDIS. Failing that, the article should be moved to Irvine Station as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Bottom line: The article cannot stay at the current title under the WP:USSTATION guideline. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:44, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Yes! There was nothing wrong with that "proper name" as the article title. This form of parenthetical disambiguation is out of sync with every other USA train station article. Irvine Station may be the primary use but that disambiguation page adequately directs here. Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:15, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The title "Irvine (train station)" is still ambiguous enough that it should instead redirect to the Irvine Station disambiguation page. I would further suggest that, unless there is a primary topic for "Irvine Station", the Irvine railway station page should also be renamed to something like Irvine railway station (Scotland).Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I suggest that if you wish to rename other articles you discuss it at their talk page. Nobody who has an interest in that article will see these comments. Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:47, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as proposed Red Slash 22:46, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support USSTATION is ridiculous, but given the existence of the Scotland station articles liked to from Irvine Station, it appears the best title to naturally disambiguate this page would be Irvine Transportation Center. Side note to anyone else who was confused looking through the article history, I believe the nominator meant November, not August. --torri²(^talk/_contribs) 09:04, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

Note about the "alternate" title suggestion: If Irvine Station is deemed the "more correct" title (though I still think that Irvine Transportation Center is the proper COMMONNAME...), but this one isn't deemed the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, then the correct title in that case (under WP:USSTATION) would almost certainly be Irvine Station (California). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- - and this is where we get into problems, by suggesting multiple alternates rather than your first choice. This allows the discussion to wander off course and go on and on and on . . . . Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:50, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, I'm clear on what I think the title should be. And I've included sourcing to show it. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Irvine Transportation Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Metrolink train at Irvine.jpg.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:51, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]