Talk:James White (author)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James White (author) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

James White (author) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 27, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 23, 2023.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternate History (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternate History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Alternate HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Alternate HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Alternate HistoryAlternate History

Northern Ireland Low‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Being complete is excessive?

In reply to the short story list I added being removed... WTF? Being complete is the whole point of wikipedia. Now maby it needs it's own page (List of Short Stories by James White) or womthing like that. But the list should be, at the very least, linked to from this page. Why was it simply removed? Zvar 22:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, with an author as prolific as White, we would not give a complete bibliography. Instead, we would give a list of the most important works (novels, generally, or particularly important stories), and then construct a bibliography page as you suggest. However, even then listing every single story seems excessive to me, falling under the category of What Wikipedia is Not. It is the literary equivalent of citing a list of da Vinci's paintings and including every sketch he ever made. Either way, a bibliography page would probably be appropriate.Michaelbusch 23:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some sources

Might be useful: --Philcha (talk) ---Philcha (talk) 15:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Perfume of Garbage: Modernity and the Archaeological - "James White’s short story, Deadly Litter, dealt with the hazards of space junk in 1960"
Monsters and Medics (review) - sumarises stories.
Earth Final Conflict-The First Protector (Amazon) - Publishers Weekly and Booklist reviews
Raymond's Reviews #141: The Silent Stars Go By
Technobabble Book Reviews - James White - plot summaries
The Andromeda Project - James White - plot summaries
Michael Ashley (2005). Transformations: Volume 2 in the History of the Science Fiction Magazine, 1950-1970. Liverpool University Press. ISBN 0853237697. Retrieved 2008-12-19.
- p 146 (chapter "Creative Chaos"): White (and Bob Shaw) low-profile as published in UK mags, while Chandler & Brunner higher profile as published in US mags; only Brunner, White and Shaw made solid reps in 1960; White gained "a steady following" fo rhis "scientifically accurate" stories, "often centred on thems of conflict"
- p 223 (ch "The New Wave"): White an example of New Worlds' strength in hard SF; Deep Space 9 reminiscent of Sector General
- throughout: SF publishing in trough around 1960.
Andrews, G. (29 September 1999). "James White (obituary)". The Guardian. England: Guardian News and Media Limited. Retrieved 24 November 2009. --Philcha (talk) 10:09, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

rating

Another article not far off from GA, imo, therfore i rated it B (higher needs an official GA nomination and review). Is there no free picture available? Even without one, i would recomend using the author infobox (like the one at Arthur C Clarke).Yobmod (talk) 14:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking about GA. I searched for a free pic, found none. May have to go the FUR route. Thanks.

What other improvements can you suggest? --Philcha (talk) 10:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox title

Uhh... i feel really stupid asking this, but why does it say 'Sir Arthur C Clarke' in the infobox heading? It looks like its been there for ages and isn't vandalism. Is this one of Clarke's pen names or what? If so, might want to clarify it in the lead.

Kare Kare (talk) 01:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Fixed it, thanks! --Philcha (talk) 07:53, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:James White 01.png

Copy of [1] to User talk:Explicit: --Philcha (talk) 07:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you deleted this image. There was no advance of deletion on the file page, its Talk page, the relevant article's Talk page, or my Talk page - I'd have picked up any of these on my watchlist. If the image upload form does not provide the relevant facilities or information, then the process should improve. I did provide a FUR, and far as can see there was nothing wrong worth that. Of course I can't check that, now you've remove the evidence. The image procedure becomes like the worst type of tax system by the day. --Philcha (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2009 (UTC) (fix discussion heading -Philcha (talk) 14:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on James White (author). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081007190302/http://www.space.com/sciencefiction/double_contact_991103.html to http://www.space.com/sciencefiction/double_contact_991103.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:14, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on James White (author). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111005234542/http://www.novacon38.org.uk/past_cons.htm to http://www.novacon38.org.uk/past_cons.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James White (author). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090325170247/http://traumwerk.stanford.edu/~mshanks/writing/M-M-Garbage.pdf to http://traumwerk.stanford.edu/~mshanks/writing/M-M-Garbage.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on James White (author). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]