Talk:Jennifer M. Webb

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Melbourne Low‑importance

	Australia portal Jennifer M. Webb is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Archaeology: Women in archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women in archaeology task force.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Mckercher, bob, and du cros, hilary. 2002. Cultural Tourism : The Partnership Between Tourism and Cultural Heritage Management. Florence: Routledge. Accessed January 19, 2019. ProQuest Ebook Central.

Cros, Hilary Du. "A New Model to Assist in Planning for Sustainable Cultural Heritage Tourism." International Journal of Tourism Research3, no. 2 (March 3, 2001): 165-70. Accessed January 19, 2019. doi:10.1002/jtr.297.

Mckercher, Bob, Pamela S.y. Ho, and Hilary Du Cros. "Relationship between Tourism and Cultural Heritage Management: Evidence from Hong Kong." Tourism Management26, no. 4 (August 1, 2005): 539-48. Accessed January 19, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2004.02.018.

Peer Review

Overall I would say this is a great start to a Wiki article. The lead is concise yet informative and the other sections are organized in an easy to follow manner. A decent amount of information has been added so far, the tone is neutral, and the references look good. Small points that could be improved are mostly grammar and sentence structure. There is a typo in the sentence appearing in the 'education' section and in the 'career' section the first sentence is awkward. The two halves of the sentence don't appear to go together. I would also recommend adding links to specific publications in addition to the information in the 'publications' section. Apart from those small things this looks excellent so far.

Inquisitive Siren (talk) 07:23, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Aloura[reply]