Talk:John Block

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Disambiguation

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move[edit]

Reason to move this page is because there one John Block. This page was used as redirect to John Rusling Block

Support

~~Peteve 16:46, 14 November 2005 (UTC)~~[reply]

When I started working on John Nicolaas Block I didn't know he had a middle name so I 'needed' the "John Block" page and suggested that this page could be renamed into "John Block (disambiguation)" with as result that "John Block" would become available and that the link to "John Rusling Block" would not vanish. After I found out about the middle name that problem was solved. In the mentioned reason the words "more than" were erroneously omitted. Sorry for any inconvenience. Peteve 15:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you're trying to move this page. It's a disambiguation page for the two John Blocks on Wikipedia. Are you saying that one is more notable than the other and therefore deserves the main John Block article? Please explain the reasons for the move here and on the Wikipedia:Requested moves page. —Cleared as filed. 23:20, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

It's fine as it is. There's no reason to have a page with (disambiguation) in the name unless someone is so important as to take the main article name. Tedernst 07:35, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, you only need "disambiguation" in the title if one of them is clearly important enough to be the default. Gene Nygaard 15:56, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved.