This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
John Yates (bishop) is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
I disagree with not adding intermediate Who's Who refs. Recently I have read articles clearly generated by a Newspaper obit for which no additional corroboration has been sought. Often the editor has little knowledge of career progresion within organisations such as the British Army, legal system or established church. I seek to add verification from sources I have or know are reliable ie Times On Line. Often Newspaper obits are not as accurate as one would wish.
Bashereyre (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On the other hand Who's Who is based almost entirely on returns by the subject, and I have previously seen doubts cast on its reliability as a source. That was the main reason I removed it. When I have time, I intend to dig out the London Gazette references for his senior ecclesiastical appointments (incidentally these are also the definitive source for commissions and prmootions in the armed services, and taking silk and appointment to judicial office). The obits here are from The Guardian and The Telegraph and (pace the Guardian's past reputation for spelling errors), neither seems inherently less reliable than The Times. David Underdown (talk) 21:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
