Talk:Joseph Bazalgette

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joseph Bazalgette article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Transport Mid‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

Civil engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tone

I've tagged the "Sewer works" section for tone, as phrasing like "The basic premise of this expensive project was wrong, as so often happens, but the end result was much better than expected, which is a rare occurrence." and similar feels a bit chatty for an encyclopaedia article. Thryduulf (talk) 12:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can see why you would object to that sentence, but it seems to be gone, and the tone now seems fine to me. I'm going to remove the tag. --Trovatore (talk) 07:59, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Joseph Bazalgette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071217215803/http://www.dulwich.org.uk/client_files/doc_docs/MastersReport04-05.pdf to http://www.dulwich.org.uk/client_files/doc_docs/MastersReport04-05.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:19, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rainfall records

In the 1870s, J.W Bazalgette lived at Spring Gardens, Westminster, and kept monthly rainfall records. These are now (Apr 2020) being digitized and studied by the Rainfall Rescue project. https://panoptes-uploads.zooniverse.org/production/subject_location/a914f098-1b5e-4b13-8055-0681a5eafc71.jpeg 78.144.95.84 (talk) 22:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible citogenesis

This is the source of a possible citogenesis, plus the sources that were added today. Reported by Ganesha811 on the Teahouse.

Bazalgette's foresight may be seen in the diameter of the sewers. When planning the network he took the densest population, gave every person the most generous allowance of sewage production and came up with a diameter of pipe needed. He then said 'Well, we're only going to do this once and there's always the unforeseen'<ref>{{Cite web|last=Gapper|first=John|date=3 October 2020|title=John Gapper’s fantasy dinner: Joseph Bazalgette and Rosalind Franklin|url=https://www.ft.com/content/8303b31e-64bc-4036-9c10-7c6dd4f3c1e6|url-status=live|website=FT Magazine|publisher=Financial Times}}</ref> and doubled the diameter to be used. His foresight allowed for the unforeseen increase in population density with the introduction of the tower block; with the original, smaller pipe diameter the sewer would have overflowed in the 1960s, rather than coping until the present day as it has.

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 01:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ganesha811: I found this entry in The Concise Dictionary of National Biography from 1922, but still no dice on the quote nor the diameter issue. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 02:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheTechnician27, good find. The closest I have come to finding anything so far is this record from the House of Commons (link), which at least comes close to approaching the subject. However, it does not actually involve Bazalgette, but rather the MP and a Mr. Pilbrow discussing enlarging a particular pipe if the *population* were doubled, not the diameter of the pipe. I think it's just coincidence, and not actually related. Ganesha811 (talk) 04:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For anyone reading this section after seeing the hidden note on the main page, here's a link to the discussion on the Teahouse that contains the most detail about this issue

Ganesha811 (talk) 14:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This claim just appeared on the top page of Reddit today[1], it is likely to become a persistent myth so anyone reading this in the future should be weary if they have no citation before the 21st century. Citizen Premier (talk) 08:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What a pity. I'm glad to see at least a few people noted that it was nowhere in the article, and a couple even checked the talk page and realized what happened. With luck, the debunkers will get more prominence next time it's reposted. —Ganesha811 (talk) 08:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wording leads to wrong interpretation?

I'm commenting here because I'm not familiar with the subject matter. The 'Early Life' first paragraph appears to say that Bazalgette's mother was the grandson ... which seems unlikely. The sentence probably needs rearranging. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2403:B4C0:F100:600:1A60:24FF:FE9D:D8F4 (talk) 14:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed - good catch, thanks for pointing that out. —Ganesha811 (talk) 15:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]