This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
@Publius Obsequium: the source you are adding is a book written by Michael Grosso a well known paranormal writer who also claims to be psychic himself and once attacked by ghosts. Grosso is not a professional biographer or trained historian. His books have no acceptance in the academic world. We would not cite this source per the number of WP:Fringe claims it makes. Grosso actually believes St. Joseph could levitate who also invokes quantum woo. Definitely not a reliable source for a historical biography. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe we should add it to the reception but along with Radford's criticism of it? I agree that it shouldn't be on the biography section, tho. Bonus Person (talk) 03:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can see no reason why Grosso's book should be discussed at all. It is WP:FRINGE exemplified. AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was originally inserted with erroneous attribution. I corrected and trimmed it, but do agree the source is unacceptably credulous fringe. - LuckyLouie (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A book first published in 2016 was attributed to Jule Eisenbud, who died in 1999? That is just bizarre... AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:19, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
