Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Jubilee Medal "70 Years of Victory in the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945"

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Well, this is my first page. I don't think it's too bad, but I need some help with the links and what not. No idea why that Corenbot thing says it is copied. UniformMan (talk) 05:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, UniformMan, not bad at all for a first effort. The bot picked up on an external page that re-used Wikipedia content (same editor, probably); but it looks as if you did, in a way, copy this, by using Jubilee Medal "65 Years of Victory in the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945" as a model. That's fine, Wikipedia content is free to use in this or any other way; however, you should provide attribution of the source you copied from. I've done that for you this time (see the violet arrow above). You still need to change the image caption (it still reads "65") and you can copy the missing reference from that article and paste it somewhere suitable here if it is relevant; otherwise you can delete the citation here (search for "1099" to find it). And then on with next! Enjoy! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
UniformMan, I admire the eagerness, but you must ensure the data in the article is relevant and factual. The dates, references and criteria are for another medal. Although similar, the info was not the same. It's fixed now. Fdutil (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Jubilee Medal "70 Years of Victory in the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945"'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "decree1099":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 08:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Refs fixed, not only orphaned ones but all refs were incorrect, simply copied from another article. Fdutil (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]