This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article strangely fails to deal, at all, with what Thurman is working on now. Twice she's taken on mighty, eight-year projects
involving vast research and countless revisions. Thurman might find it exhausting, but satisfying, to rescue Edna St. Vincent Millay from
feeble biographers of the past. Daniel Epstein was embarrassingly in love with his subject in WHOSE LIPS MY LIPS HAVE KISSED. It made him, well, sloppy.
Nancy Milford was not equal to her subject matter in SAVAGE BEAUTY. One of our best American poets, and one with the richest life events,
has never had a biographer with the ability and persistence to do her justice. Judith Thurman would be that person.
23.121.115.9 (talk) 13:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]