Talk:KIT (gene)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

The official symbol for this (both mouse and human) is Kit. (Well, technically Kit and KIT). The title should be KIT, I think. Mary Mangan (talk) 03:15, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I support the proposed move. --Arcadian (talk) 16:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also support. Kit is both the 'offical' term from the human gene nomenclature committee, as well as by far the most common used term for this gene. Ceolas (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Independovirus (talk) 11:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm shocked that this move hasn't happened yet! The 'CD117' designation didn't arise until several years after the discovery of the gene, such that the actual gene is being redirected to its flow cytometry number.Mdonken (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CD117. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151030025033/http://www.kolltan.com:80/news/kolltan-pharmaceuticals-to-present-at-the-11th-annual-pegs-the-essential-protein-engineering-summit/ to http://www.kolltan.com/news/kolltan-pharmaceuticals-to-present-at-the-11th-annual-pegs-the-essential-protein-engineering-summit/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name

@Boghog: Should this be moved to the Uniprot name Mast/stem cell growth factor receptor Kit? Iamnotabunny (talk) 19:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a close call. Mast/stem cell growth factor receptor Kit is a bit long for an article title. I lean toward not renaming it. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 19:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]