Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Kim Guadagno

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Can anyone find out what her exact birthdate is? She is soon to be the Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey after all. These things need to be known for such prominent public officials.

Exactly why does it need to be known? 70.214.78.144 (talk) 00:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Information

[edit]

The statement "She is affectionately known as "Snooki" by her eldest son, Kevin" does not seem to appear in the listed source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.118.95.254 (talk) 18:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No kidding. 70.214.78.144 (talk) 00:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry photo

[edit]

Today User:Hekerui has added back into this article's infobox a photo of Kim Guadagno that I removed a couple of months ago. WP:IMAGE says: "Poor quality images (too dark, blurry, etc.) or where the subject in the image is too small, hidden in clutter, ambiguous or otherwise not obvious, should not be used." This photo -- or at least the portion that centers on the lt. gov's face -- is very blurry. I realize there is a "judgment call" to be made as to "how blurry is too blurry," but I really think that by any reasonable standard, this one is too blurry. Can anyone really look at this photo and say it is of acceptable quality? I really don't think it makes Wikipedia look good. (Get it, "look good"?) Obviously it would be good to have a photo of the subject, but as I said in my edit summary when I deleted it, having no photo would be better than having this photo. It makes my eyes hurt to look at it. Neutron (talk) 23:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more of the school of "better a recognizable photo than none" and one can actually see her here, but fine, a removal may also stimulate a user to upload/find a better image. Hekerui (talk) 06:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kim Guadagno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Guadagno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additional citations tag

[edit]

I suggest the "additional citations" tag at the top of the article can be removed. As of today the article has 38 endnotes, which seems sufficient Asburyparker (talk) 19:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kim Guadagno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]