Talk:Lee Silverman voice treatment

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from Parkinson's disease was copied or moved into Lee Silverman voice treatment with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Lee Silverman voice treatment.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Original reference

PMC 1763504 provides a reference to a 1987 paper in which LSVT was first described. The reference is:

Ramig L, Mead C, Scherer R, et al. Voice therapy and Parkinson’s disease: a longitudinal study of efficacy. Paper presented at the Clinical Dysarthria Conference; 1988. San Diego, CA: 1988.

That's about as verifiable as we can get it... I wonder who Lee Silverman actually was. JFW | T@lk 22:18, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on structure

I really like your article! It's an interesting topic! I have a piece of advice to your article. I think you can change the "Section 1/2/3" parts into different subtitles, just to make the article look more formal. Also, I think some of the contents in section 1 can be included in section 2, because they are actually the explanation of the treatment process. WangjingFrog (talk) 15:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

possible change to effects section

Nutrition32I think you should refer to the manual of style for this subject Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Medicine-related_articles and make some minor changes so it does not appear as if you are offering medical advice. Just a thought. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saguaromelee (talk • contribs) 16:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Typo

I really enjoyed the article but I believe there might be a typo. In the background section there is the sentence: "The Voice Treatment is for weeks long," I don't know if you meant to type four but besides this it is a great article.

Mianina0 (talk) 16:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One possible change

Nutrition32, you have added some great additions to this stub. My one suggestion is to change this line: "In the two videos cited, both patients were asked to take a breath and say "Ahh" as long as they can." I would references the actual people/organizations in charge of the video to give this article more of a professional feel. Also, it will help other people doing research trace back to these people faster and see other works they have done. Nevertheless, great start!CDOcean (talk) 03:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

POV and Advert tags

This article has both of these tags, but there is no discussion of them on the talk page. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given. The same is true of the "written like an advertisement" claim, though I recently removed an ad-like phrase in the lead. Lou Sander (talk) 03:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of discussion and justification, I removed these tags. Feel free to restore them if you can provide a rationale. Lou Sander (talk) 13:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More sources

I don't know how this happened, but Googling 'lee silverman voice treatment' gave as its first hit a long list of scholarly articles on the subject. Lou Sander (talk) 03:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clarifying

The "voice" in "Lee Silverman voice treatment" (LSVT) is a bit of a misnomer. LSVT actually has two separate treatments: LSVT-LOUD (which is voice treatment), and LSVT-BIG (which is movement therapy). They are both delivered under the auspices of a specialized company called LSVT Global. Maybe the article should be renamed as LSVT (or similar), with redirects from Lee Silverman voice treatment, LSVT-LOUD, and LSVT-BIG. I don't know what the MOS says about capitalizing Voice and Treatment, but they are pretty universally capitalized when the whole affair is mentioned outside of Wikipedia. Lou Sander (talk) 06:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lee Silverman voice treatment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423165901/http://www.lsvtglobal.com/index.php?action=home to http://www.lsvtglobal.com/index.php?action=home

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]