Talk:Legal Adviser of the Department of State
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger Proposal
[edit]I think this article: Office of the Legal Adviser should be merged here and turned into a redirect going here. Any objections?John Z 03:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I have formally proposed that two articles should be merged. --TommyBoy (talk) 01:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I would support merging the articles. Gage (talk) 03:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Merged
[edit]Redirected United States Department of State Office of the Legal Adviser here, wasn't much additional useful in the other article -
Here is its complete content, in case the rulings mentioned deserve more prominenceJohn Z (talk) 05:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC):
The Office of the Legal Advisor is an agency of the United States Department of State. The office was created by Executive Order in 1931 and is headed by the Legal Adviser of the Department of State. According to articles published in the Washington Post c.1989, this office issued four 'secret' rulings prior to the 1988-89 US invasion of Panama.
One ruling interpreted President Gerald Ford's Executive Order 11905 prohibiting U.S. assassinations of foreign leaders. The ruling said only intentional killings of foreign leaders were prohibited; 'accidental' killings of foreign leaders were thus allowed. The effect of this ruling was to allow or signal that the U.S. could now accidentally kill Manuel Noriega.
Another ruling affected "posse comitatus,", the law that bars the U.S. military from acting as police during peacetime. The ruling noted that for a U.S. law to apply outside the U.S. territory, Congress must explicitly say the law has extraterritorial effect, But Congress did not say so as to 'posse comitatus.' Thus, the ruling said, the U.S. military could act as police outside U.S. territory, for example in Panama.
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Stub-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- List-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- List-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- List-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles