Talk:Leica M (Typ 262)

Photography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of consumer electronics be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Merge

There seems no reason for this to be a separate article; it can be merged into Leica M (camera), it's one model in the series. Pol098 (talk) 10:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is unwise. There have already been several models in the M series, and there will be more. Cf. Sony_A7#Model_differences which is already turning into a huge unmaintained mess, and with the next generation of devices will become too wide for typical screen sizes. Instead, we should genericise the parent article and keep the details in the individual child articles. Samsara 13:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I would suggest that the parent article should discuss other models of the M series, such as the Monochrom and M-E. Samsara 14:45, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]