Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Leucippe and Clitophon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leucippe and Clitophon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'according to whom': here's a source

[edit]

YouTube video: Yale course on New testament, Lecture 20, 'The anti-household Paul: Thecla', Chapter 1, by Professor Dale Martin 50.220.95.38 (talk) 21:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious comments in dating discussion

[edit]

The paragraph beginning with "The problem with this otherwise conclusive theory is the much earlier date of the papyri of A.T." is factually inaccurate. In the same section, the papyri in question are shown to be later than the mentioned event, not "much earlier." 2603:9001:6D00:53C6:31FD:D76D:D124:D0E0 (talk) 01:25, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]