Talk:Levant Front

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Levant Front article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Syria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

opposition to ISIS, et al

I guess what I meant to ask is: why is this group opponents with ISIS? they are both enemies of the Assad regime, and both Sunni.

There is no explanation of any history or context that puts these guys in the context of this whole war, other than they are Aleppo-based.

I can't tell why their alliances are so pitch perfectly aligned with US interests and they coalesced like 5 months ago. WHO ARE THEY REALLY?? or in the parlance of Wikipedia, if they are one of like a hundred groups running around that region, taking over some town or another, losing it back later, WHY ARE THEY NOTABLE?

thank you. Tangy 303 Mamet Sauce (talk) 05:59, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ISIS considers these Sunni groups to be apostates because of their ties to the international community and their refusal to pledge allegiance to their caliphate.

They are notable because Aleppo is the largest city in Syria, not some town, and the group is a coalition of the "largest armed groups in northern Syria". The links in the article to the different groups involved gives substantial detail on who they are. Gazkthul (talk) 07:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fine. but you sound pro-them. and I feel like they could morph as fast as ISIS does into something else & I can't tell why they'd be any better at running a state than ISIS or Assad. ISIS is horrific, but idk,, like- this whole thing makes me miss the Saddam regime.

Have fun with your encyclopedia article. I hope all the good Western-backed rebels kill all the bad rebels. Because all the insurgent-fighting and state-building the US did in Iraq worked out so well. Tangy 303 Mamet Sauce (talk) 03:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This wiki is terrible. It appears edited by the pro-Assad guy who is inappropriately using this talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:247:C201:B488:F8FC:1EAC:6523:7904 (talk) 21:29, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Levant Front. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150325160049/http://www.alankabout.com/arabic_international_news/middle_east_news/75543.html to http://www.alankabout.com/arabic_international_news/middle_east_news/75543.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]