Talk:Liberalism and the Limits of Justice
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am not a philosopher
[edit]In his view, Rawls' philosophy shares the metaphysical assumptions of Kantian ethics, in which a purely noumenal self that is detached from all empirical constraints somehow retains motives that enable it to make choices.
Why can't this be formulated as an as-if rule as we do in computer science?
We would then imagine a purely noumenal self that is detached from all empirical constraints, while retaining the ability to make choices in the real world on the basis of the thought experiment. — MaxEnt 01:31, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
SoRRY. I already imaged my reply to your communist page...it livesa for eternaty ... tought shit to you communists
Categories:
- Stub-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class philosophical literature articles
- Low-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- Stub-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- Stub-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- Stub-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles