Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ammunition

Um, LSAT is working on CTA (Cased Telescoped Ammunition) NOT polymer cased ammunition. That stuff has been on the market for a couple of years already. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.74.120 (talk) 01:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The CTA cartridge cases under development for the LSAT are made of plastic. --D.E. Watters (talk) 02:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"first significant step"

Re: this claim: "lightening small arms is the first significant step towards increasing soldiers' lethality and survivability." This obviously needs qualification of some kind. As it stands, it implies military technology has been stagnant for thousands of years, with only minor cosmetic improvements (like firearms, helmets, body armor, radios…) until some genius said "make the kit lighter." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C2:1A80:7C10:5CB:1F53:BCA1:B032 (talk) 17:22, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Tremendous progress"

Re: this claim in the article: "As of 2008, the program has achieved tremendous progress." Says who? This claim should be sourced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.86.119.173 (talk) 03:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need an update

I don't think we have heard anything on this project in a few years. What's the current status now? ScienceApe (talk) 16:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems they have a fireable LMG, an almost fireable assault rifle and decent plastic cased ammo. The caseless ammo seems not up to scratch yet. There are rumours that the current NATO caliber (the cased 5,56 mm) lacks stopping power and performance at range, and that a new LSAT round will have to take that into consideration. Before this is resolved, I would imagine the LSAT-project is in something of a limbo. Some source and a video to prove it actually goes bang. Petter Bøckman (talk) 21:11, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Lightweight Small Arms Technologies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lightweight Small Arms Technologies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109033418/http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2007-07-Future_Need_for_VTOL_STOL_Aircraft.pdf to http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2007-07-Future_Need_for_VTOL_STOL_Aircraft.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lightweight Small Arms Technologies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Advanteges of a plastic case vs. caseless

In the article it states like plastic case would have a markedly better heat performance compared to caseless cartridge. I very much doubt that claim, but if there's a source for that, I'm ready to check my stance. --J. Sketter (talk) 16:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]