Talk:Lionel of Antwerp, Duke of Clarence

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

English Royalty

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Representing his father where?

Wasn't Lionel his father representative in Ireland not England? GoodDay (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Written from a Modern perspective that holds no historical value.

Belgium didn't exist back then (as his place of birth should state Brabant, and then the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation), and Brabant wasn't flemish, that's a modern term for what we today call Belgophone (Dutch-Speaking) Belgium, it's like writing about someone from Utrecht and claiming he was from Holland (a Hollander/Holandic), or stating that a Scotsman is English because it belongs to the United Kingdom of Great-Britain & Northern-Ireland, I suggest that Flemish and Belgian be replaced with Brabantic, and that the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation be added where it belongs. --1.55.1.245 (talk) 02:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

stature

I don't care if it's referenced, the assertion about Lionel Of Antwerp's stature is highly questionable. Perhaps it would be more accurate to state that "it has been suggested that ... " or "such and such a source has stated that ..." rather than stating plainly that he "grew to be nearly seven feet in height". If anyone has measured his skeleton and can verify this assertion then fair enough, but otherwise it is certainly subject to doubt! The text to me reads like something out of a primary school children's book. John2o2o2o (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@John2o2o2o: Please see the essay, Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. Peaceray (talk) 20:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Title

As Lionel is a Royal Duke, son of Edward III, shouldn't his title be simply Lionel of Antwerp, Duke of Clarence? The 1st in his title suggests he is non-royal.

For example: Prince George, Duke of Kent, son of George V; as distinct from John Howard, 1st Duke of Norfolk, a non-royal duke.

Agreed. I have never seen him referred to as "1st" Duke. For those of you who need a book (you know who you are Wikipedants) , Alison Weir in her book on the genealogy of Britains Royal families (called Britains Royal Families) refers to him on p95/96 as "Duke of Clarence" with no number. John2o2o2o (talk) 21:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What, do you folks have a problem with Lionel of Antwerp, 1st Duke of Clarence, Thomas of Lancaster, 1st Duke of Clarence, & George Plantagenet, 1st Duke of Clarence all being the 1st Duke of Clarence?

I find it terribly confusing myself, but I do think that it bears more research to determine what the contemporary & historical designations were & are.

Peaceray (talk) 21:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More source material at Wikisource:Lionel of Antwerp (DNB00)

There is a lot more material in wikisource:Lionel of Antwerp (DNB00) than can be incorporated into this article. Peaceray (talk) 20:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Death date

This is a bit confusing since the 1911 Britannica gives it at 7th Oct, as does the 1893 DNB link. I don't have easy access to the modern ODNB link. However, "A collection of all the wills, now known to be extant, of the kings and queens of England, princes and princesses of Wales, and every branch of the blood royal, from the reign of William the Conqueror to that of Henry the Seventh exclusive : with explanatory notes, and a glossary" gives it as the 17th, "having made this will not a fortnight earlier". So I think the 17th is probably correct. http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/ENGLAND,%20Kings%201066-1603.htm#Lioneldied1368 also gives it as the 17th. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a friend to check the ODNB and it also gives the 17th. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]